A |
---|
I |
---|
Question: (Last edited: Wednesday, April 15, 2020, 4:12 PM)I need some advice on how to pace each daily lesson. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Answer: (This comes from my original post here: https://embarc.online/mod/page/view.php?id=3070) Pacing is a common first-year concern. Here are some quick tidbits...
All of the above can easily be fit into a 45 minute time period. | ||||
S |
---|
Question: (Last edited: Wednesday, April 15, 2020, 4:12 PM)Some teachers/kids are struggling on the fluency Practice. Some of those time tests are rigorous and some of our kids give up with frustration. Would you advise going back to basic facts fluency or trudging forward as the program indicates? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Answer: When students struggle with the nature of those fluencies being timed, then don't use time. Extend the time for students to do those fluency practices. Minimize the emphasis on speed. To asses fluency, the teacher can simply observe students as they do the work. It is visibly obvious who is fluent and who isn't. No need for a timer to do this. | ||||
T |
---|
Question: (Last edited: Wednesday, April 15, 2020, 4:12 PM)Teachers are complaining that the kids don't understand the concept in the lesson. Is your advice to move on or should the teachers reteach the lessons. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Answer: In a typical teaching environment, teaches should pace each lesson to last one day. Teachers customize the lesson by selecting which (if any) fluencies to do, whether to do the application problem, which examples problems in the Concept Development, and which problems of the Problem Set are the "must do" problems. Even when students seem to be totally confused by a lesson, 90% of the time the proper thing for the teacher to do is to move on to the next lesson. I don't recommend many days specifically devoted to review...like on Fridays. Rather, I give a short culminating quiz at the end of each topic. This culminating quiz is formative for me and acts as review for the students. it kills two birds with one stone. | ||||
Question: (Last edited: Wednesday, April 15, 2020, 4:14 PM)Teachers are using your video lessons as part of their lessons before they do the problem sets, is that advisable or are the videos just for the teachers. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Answer: Yes...students are welcome to watch my videos prior to doing their work. I specifically made my videos using the homework problems, so I suggest students to the HOMEWORK problems so that students can have support at home. (Not all students have parents who can help with the math...so parents and students can use my videos instead.) | ||||
W |
---|
Question: (Last edited: Friday, April 17, 2020, 7:57 AM)what are your thoughts/recommendations for having students work past their grade level standards once grade level standard mastery is met? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Answer: In general, I am opposed to it. There are numerous math concepts that could be explored in depth rather than just moving on to the next grade: combinatorics, discrete math, optimization problems, etc. Open Middle and NRICH are two excellent resources for such problems. I want to do all I can to prevent math from being something we race through. For students who need more, let them explore every beautiful nook and cranny of their own grade level before moving on. All this being said I have had a few extreme cases such as a 3rd grader taking calculus and an 8th grader taking college courses. | ||||